NAWGX : Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund A

NAWGX is a Allocation Market Total World with MODERATE fees.

NAWGX

Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund A

FI Score

47 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NAWGX vs HFHCX

21% FI Score
  • hfhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs ADVIX

21% FI Score
  • advix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Vaughan Nelson International Small Cap Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs MSYLX

21% FI Score
  • msylx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust High Yield Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs NNINX

21% FI Score
  • nninx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia North Carolina Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs BXIAX

21% FI Score
  • bxiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Global Credit Income Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs NBNCX

21% FI Score
  • nbncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Neuberger Berman International Select Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs SCCUX

21% FI Score
  • sccux
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Invesco Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs MPGEX

21% FI Score
  • mpgex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Meritage Growth Equity Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs ARSKX

21% FI Score
  • arskx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Archer Stock Fund

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs FTXD

20% FI Score
  • ftxd
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

First Trust Nasdaq Retail ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs CASTX

20% FI Score
  • castx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Castle Focus Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs TMLDX

20% FI Score
  • tmldx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Thrivent Multidimensional Income Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs SAINX

20% FI Score
  • sainx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Seix Corporate Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs DRFMX

20% FI Score
  • drfmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs PCICX

20% FI Score
  • pcicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PGIM California Muni Income Fund-Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs FICAX

20% FI Score
  • ficax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Delaware Tax-Free California II Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs AAIIX

20% FI Score
  • aaiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Ancora Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs PIGRX

20% FI Score
  • pigrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Putnam International Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs APIBX

20% FI Score
  • apibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Yorktown Short Term Bond Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 2.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAWGX vs KMVAX

20% FI Score
  • kmvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo