Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$NARAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- cubix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- asbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America® Class C
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lsst
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bldfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Blackrock Low Duration Bond Portfolio Investor C3 Shares
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eagmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rinf
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sdag
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
IQ Short Duration Enhanced Core Bond U.S. ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ftiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Short-Term Income Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- liiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Corporate Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »