Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$NAINX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- gagvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Goldman Sachs Blue Chip Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ecln
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Utilities
First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »
- eehix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
AXS Alternative Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- emdzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund-Class Z
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ksmix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Keeley Small-Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ctasx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hwmcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bgmax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
BMO Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- igiax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Integrity Growth & Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »