NAESX : Vanguard Small Capitalization Index Fund Investor Shares

NAESX is a US Stocks Market Small Blend index fund with LOW fees.

NAESX

Vanguard Small Capitalization Index Fund Investor Shares

FI Score

87 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NAESX vs ASICX

34% FI Score
  • asicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs AWSCX

34% FI Score
  • awscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Core Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs AXEAX

34% FI Score
  • axeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Columbia Contrarian Europe Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs AZMAX

34% FI Score
  • azmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AllianzGI Emerging Markets Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs BCSAX

34% FI Score
  • bcsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs BEARX

34% FI Score
  • bearx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Federated Prudent Bear Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 2.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs BGSCX

34% FI Score
  • bgscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs BISAX

34% FI Score
  • bisax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs BLRCX

34% FI Score
  • blrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs PFI

34% FI Score
  • pfi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco DWA Financial Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs RBGCX

34% FI Score
  • rbgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs CDICX

34% FI Score
  • cdicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs CFICX

34% FI Score
  • cficx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calvert Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs CHIH

34% FI Score
  • chih
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Health Care ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs PPUCX

34% FI Score
  • ppucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (Unhedged) Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs PGVAX

34% FI Score
  • pgvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

PGIM Government Income Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs PHYMX

34% FI Score
  • phymx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam High Yield Fund Class M

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs CHIS

34% FI Score
  • chis
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Consumer Staples ETF

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs NECLX

34% FI Score
  • neclx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government and Agency Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NAESX vs CIGAX

34% FI Score
  • cigax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

BlackRock U.S. Government Bond Portfolio Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo