Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$MWOCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ktrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
DWS Global Income Builder Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ekgix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Global Small Cap Fund Class Inst
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- igeix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Voya Global Equity Dividend Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- revcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Columbia Global Equity Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- appix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Appleseed Fund Institutional Share
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tvfvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Third Avenue Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bnglx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
UBS Global Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- glosx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Pioneer Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- thocx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Thornburg Global Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »