Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
3 /10
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Guggenheim Enhanced Equity Income
Expenses: 2.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »
RBC BlueBay Global Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »
Thornburg Low Duration Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Prudential Day One 2030 Fund Class R2
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
American Century Emerging Markets Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
Aberdeen Income Credit Strategies Fund
Expenses: 3.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
BlackRock U.S. Government Bond Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
PGIM Muni High Income Fund-Class B
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
PGIM QMA Long-Short Equity Fund-Class A
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
Wells Fargo Global Small Cap Fund Class Inst
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
AllianzGI Global Sustainability Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Plus Fund
Expenses: 3.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund Trust Class
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
George Putnam Balanced Fund Class M
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2025 Adam Fortuna
Site Map