MUST : Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF

MUST is a Bond Market Municipal Bond with LOW fees.

MUST

Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF

FI Score

55 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MUST vs MIDSX

  • midsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Midas Fund

Expenses: 4.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs ACT

  • act
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

AdvisorShares Vice ETF

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs DGQAX

  • dgqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AmericaFirst Defensive Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs EKAR

  • ekar
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

Ideanomics Shares NextGen Vhcl andTchETF

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs SFPAX

  • sfpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Saratoga Financial Service Portfolio Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs RYMAX

  • rymax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Rydex Telecommunications Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs SFPIX

  • sfpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Saratoga Financial Service Portfolio Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 3.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs UKPSX

  • ukpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort Japan Fund Service Class

Expenses: 2.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs SHPAX

  • shpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Portfolio Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs ASARX

  • asarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Asset Management Fund Ultra Short Mortgage Fund

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs RYCRX

  • rycrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Rydex Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs FDPIX

  • fdpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Money Market
  • World

ProFunds Falling U.S. Dollar Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs SHPCX

  • shpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Portfolio Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs UNPSX

  • unpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Ultra International Fund Service Class

Expenses: 3.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs RYMJX

  • rymjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Rydex Commodities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs TMPFX

  • tmpfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund

Expenses: 100.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs RYRCX

  • ryrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclical

Rydex Retailing Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclical Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs SBMBX

  • sbmbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Portfolio Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs SEPCX

  • sepcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Portfolio Fund Class C

Expenses: 4.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MUST vs PDFDX

  • pdfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Perkins Discovery Fund

Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo