MULSX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Ultra-Short Income Portfolio Class IR

MULSX is a Alternative Market Short with LOW fees.

MULSX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Ultra-Short Income Portfolio Class IR

FI Score

74 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MULSX vs SEUPX

18% FI Score
  • seupx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs SIEAX

18% FI Score
  • sieax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

AIG International Dividend Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs SOPIX

18% FI Score
  • sopix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds Short NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs SZGCX

18% FI Score
  • szgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

DWS ESG Global Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs TEFQX

18% FI Score
  • tefqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs THBVX

18% FI Score
  • thbvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

THB Asset Management MicroCap Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs THYCX

18% FI Score
  • thycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Touchstone High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs TMNAX

18% FI Score
  • tmnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs TNACX

18% FI Score
  • tnacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs UIPIX

18% FI Score
  • uipix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort Mid-Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs USERX

18% FI Score
  • userx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

U.S. Global Investors Gold and Precious Metals Fund

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs USPVX

18% FI Score
  • uspvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Union Street Partners Value Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs VRECX

18% FI Score
  • vrecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class CX

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs WHYCX

18% FI Score
  • whycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Wells Fargo High Yield Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs XMPT

18% FI Score
  • xmpt
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

VanEck Vectors CEF Municipal Income ETF

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs CARZ

18% FI Score
  • carz
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs AIAFX

18% FI Score
  • aiafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Aberdeen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs AMGCX

18% FI Score
  • amgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs LPCPX

18% FI Score
  • lpcpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2050 Porfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs LPHIX

18% FI Score
  • lphix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2045 Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo