Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$MUHLX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- levox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Lazard US Equity Concentrated Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sdvgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Sit Dividend Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- gspax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- hcacx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
The Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- onrdx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Invesco Oppenheimer Rising Dividends Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- drthx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund Class Z
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- afnax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- amca
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
iShares Russell 1000 Pure U.S. Revenue ETF
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »