MTIPX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Infrastructure Portfolio Class A
Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$MTIPX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation Global Equity funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fmusx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Federated Municipal Ultrashort Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.36% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- amrmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Funds American Mutual Fund® Class A
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- awshx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- bagsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- bcrix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
BlackRock CoreAlpha Bond Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- birdx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Real Estate
iShares Developed Real Estate Index Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »
- bmoax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- tglmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
TCW Total Return Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »