Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$MTFCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 746 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- dmuax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BNY Mellon AMT-Free Municipal Bond Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nsmmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia Short Term Municipal Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pctex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Putnam California Tax Exempt Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cayax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
American Century California High Yield Municipal Fund A Class
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gwmtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ealtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- must
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
Expenses: 0.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- taxf
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mtfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BMO Short Tax-Free Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »