MSUSX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class I

MSUSX is a Alternatives Market Real Estate with MODERATE fees.

MSUSX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class I

FI Score

28 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSUSX vs SFRAX

44% FI Score
  • sfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs MCSMX

44% FI Score
  • mcsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Matthews China Small Companies Fund

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs FRETX

44% FI Score
  • fretx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Franklin Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs ARSIX

44% FI Score
  • arsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs NBSSX

44% FI Score
  • nbssx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Neuberger Berman Focus Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs IDHIX

44% FI Score
  • idhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Integrity Dividend Harvest Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs NBHAX

44% FI Score
  • nbhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs LNGR

44% FI Score
  • lngr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Global X Longevity Thematic ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs MVV

44% FI Score
  • mvv
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra MidCap400

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs ATFCX

44% FI Score
  • atfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs ALDAX

44% FI Score
  • aldax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Limited Duration Credit Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs ASMNX

44% FI Score
  • asmnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs KDHAX

44% FI Score
  • kdhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

DWS CROCI Equity Dividend Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs LMMIX

44% FI Score
  • lmmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

1919 Maryland Tax-Free Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs RMUCX

44% FI Score
  • rmucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester New York Municipals Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs VANTX

44% FI Score
  • vantx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

JPMorgan New York Tax Free Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs CSD

44% FI Score
  • csd
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF

Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs QIVNX

44% FI Score
  • qivnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer International Equity Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs PRRJX

44% FI Score
  • prrjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs JLPSX

44% FI Score
  • jlpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo