MSULX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

MSULX is a Alternatives Market Real Estate with HIGH fees.

MSULX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

FI Score

15 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSULX vs SGRNX

65% FI Score
  • sgrnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Wells Fargo Growth Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs SEIMX

65% FI Score
  • seimx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

SEI Tax Exempt Trust Intermediate-Term Municipal Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs LMEIX

65% FI Score
  • lmeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

QS Conservative Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs IMOAX

65% FI Score
  • imoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs JMST

65% FI Score
  • jmst
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF

Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs OMEAX

65% FI Score
  • omeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

JPMorgan Market Expansion Enhanced Index Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs SSDWX

65% FI Score
  • ssdwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

State Street Target Retirement 2060 Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs GMWZX

65% FI Score
  • gmwzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs FCONX

65% FI Score
  • fconx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Fidelity® Conservative Income Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs DIAL

65% FI Score
  • dial
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF

Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs JHEM

65% FI Score
  • jhem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs FIENX

65% FI Score
  • fienx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Fidelity® International Enhanced Index Fund

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs EFAX

65% FI Score
  • efax
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs MNTRX

65% FI Score
  • mntrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs TRRUX

65% FI Score
  • trrux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

T. Rowe Price Target 2020 Fund

Expenses: 0.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs TLTD

65% FI Score
  • tltd
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index Fund

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs TLVIX

65% FI Score
  • tlvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund Class S

Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs HFMTX

65% FI Score
  • hfmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

The Hartford MidCap Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs GXC

65% FI Score
  • gxc
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

SPDR S&P China ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs JMIN

65% FI Score
  • jmin
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

JPMorgan U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF

Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo