MSULX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

MSULX is a Alternatives Market Real Estate with HIGH fees.

MSULX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

FI Score

15 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSULX vs AFTCX

16% FI Score
  • aftcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2020 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs ISTAX

16% FI Score
  • istax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

ICON Long/Short Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs MEMUX

16% FI Score
  • memux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Maine Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PFSRX

16% FI Score
  • pfsrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Newfleet Senior Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs HANIX

16% FI Score
  • hanix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hanlon Managed Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs GGECX

16% FI Score
  • ggecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nationwide Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs DNDGX

16% FI Score
  • dndgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs LFIFX

16% FI Score
  • lfifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Leader High Quality Low Duration Bond Fund InstitutionalShares

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs LEDIX

16% FI Score
  • ledix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard Emerging Markets Debt Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NEEGX

16% FI Score
  • neegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Needham Growth Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs AGICX

16% FI Score
  • agicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

AB Tax-Managed All Market Income Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs OEMCX

16% FI Score
  • oemcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs MOGLX

16% FI Score
  • moglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Gabelli Media Mogul Fund

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs AGFCX

16% FI Score
  • agfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Alger Responsible Investing Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs ANCIX

16% FI Score
  • ancix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Ancora MicroCap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs ANSIX

16% FI Score
  • ansix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Ancora Special Opportunity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs AOPCX

16% FI Score
  • aopcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

AllianzGI International Small-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs APITX

16% FI Score
  • apitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class L

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NIMCX

16% FI Score
  • nimcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs ARTCX

16% FI Score
  • artcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Multi Asset Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo