MSULX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

MSULX is a Alternatives Market Real Estate with HIGH fees.

MSULX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

FI Score

15 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSULX vs CMFIX

18% FI Score
  • cmfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

CM Advisors Fixed Income Fund

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs EVSEX

18% FI Score
  • evsex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Eaton Vance Special Equities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NWUCX

18% FI Score
  • nwucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Nationwide U.S. Small Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs ARCHX

18% FI Score
  • archx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Archer Balanced Fund

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs SRIFX

18% FI Score
  • srifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

FundX Sustainable Impact Fund

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PUFBX

18% FI Score
  • pufbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

PGIM Jennison Financial Services Fund- Class B

Expenses: 2.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs GTICX

18% FI Score
  • gticx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aberdeen Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs AMGCX

18% FI Score
  • amgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs VFPAX

18% FI Score
  • vfpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Private Capital Management Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NSOPX

18% FI Score
  • nsopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

North Star Opportunity Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs DNHYX

18% FI Score
  • dnhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs SDMGX

18% FI Score
  • sdmgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Sit Developing Markets Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PAGDX

18% FI Score
  • pagdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs TFLAX

18% FI Score
  • tflax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Transamerica Floating Rate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs FLRTX

18% FI Score
  • flrtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2030 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NMHCX

18% FI Score
  • nmhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs FLYCX

18% FI Score
  • flycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NASBX

18% FI Score
  • nasbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

AIG U.S. Government Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs AZSCX

18% FI Score
  • azscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

American Beacon Zebra Small Cap Equity Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs ADNPX

18% FI Score
  • adnpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

American Beacon ARK Transformational Innovation Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo