MSULX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

MSULX is a Alternatives Market Real Estate with HIGH fees.

MSULX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

FI Score

15 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSULX vs SGHCX

24% FI Score
  • sghcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DWS Global High Income Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs KOLD

24% FI Score
  • kold
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs WAMVX

24% FI Score
  • wamvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs GTMEX

24% FI Score
  • gtmex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Glenmede Large Cap Value Portfolio

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs SHXPX

24% FI Score
  • shxpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs ROSOX

24% FI Score
  • rosox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Rondure Overseas Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs ESGGX

23% FI Score
  • esggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Gabelli ESG Fund Class AAA

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs LMCJX

23% FI Score
  • lmcjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Miller Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs STSBX

23% FI Score
  • stsbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Seix Short-Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs RSFCX

23% FI Score
  • rsfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Victory Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs RYAQX

23% FI Score
  • ryaqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse Government Long Bond Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 4.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs SEVSX

23% FI Score
  • sevsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs RYLIX

23% FI Score
  • rylix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclical

Rydex Leisure Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclical Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PMKCX

23% FI Score
  • pmkcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Principal International Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs WTIFX

23% FI Score
  • wtifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Segall Bryant & Hamill Fundamental Int'l Small Cap Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PJRBX

23% FI Score
  • pjrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM QMA International Equity Fund- Class B

Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs ECERX

23% FI Score
  • ecerx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Eaton Vance Stock Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs TGNIX

23% FI Score
  • tgnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

TCW Funds, Inc. - TCW International Small Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs WGCFX

23% FI Score
  • wgcfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Growth Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs RYLDX

23% FI Score
  • ryldx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Dow 2x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo