MSULX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

MSULX is a Alternatives Market Real Estate with HIGH fees.

MSULX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

FI Score

15 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSULX vs HFHRX

25% FI Score
  • hfhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NWHWX

25% FI Score
  • nwhwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs JNVSX

25% FI Score
  • jnvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Jensen Quality Value Fund Class J

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NWHKX

25% FI Score
  • nwhkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Bailard International Equities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs HLMOX

25% FI Score
  • hlmox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PAJZX

25% FI Score
  • pajzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Global Dynamic Bond Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NBRVX

25% FI Score
  • nbrvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs MBNBX

25% FI Score
  • mbnbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Balanced Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PGTDX

25% FI Score
  • pgtdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Putnam Global Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs MGBDX

25% FI Score
  • mgbdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS Global Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs MBACX

25% FI Score
  • mbacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs ACSKX

25% FI Score
  • acskx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century Short Duration Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs ACVUX

25% FI Score
  • acvux
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

American Century International Value Fund I Class

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs AGEPX

25% FI Score
  • agepx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Beacon Frontier Markets Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs AGSAX

25% FI Score
  • agsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AB Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs ALMCX

25% FI Score
  • almcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth FundClass C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs GSICX

24% FI Score
  • gsicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PCAIX

24% FI Score
  • pcaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PGIM California Muni Income Fund-Class B

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs BIZD

24% FI Score
  • bizd
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF

Expenses: 9.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs BXGYX

24% FI Score
  • bxgyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Global High Yield Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo