MSULX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

MSULX is a Alternatives Market Real Estate with HIGH fees.

MSULX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

FI Score

15 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSULX vs PFFDX

33% FI Score
  • pffdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Pacific Funds Small-Cap Value Advisor Class

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs TACLX

33% FI Score
  • taclx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Touchstone Large Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs TWSCX

33% FI Score
  • twscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Century Strategic Allocation: Conservative Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PGNAX

33% FI Score
  • pgnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs EISGX

33% FI Score
  • eisgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NAAEX

33% FI Score
  • naaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Short Term Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NCAVX

33% FI Score
  • ncavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Nuance Concentrated Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs GSMGX

33% FI Score
  • gsmgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NEITX

33% FI Score
  • neitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nebraska Municipal Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NEMCX

33% FI Score
  • nemcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs HFDCX

33% FI Score
  • hfdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs GXXAX

33% FI Score
  • gxxax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Aberdeen U.S. Multi-Cap Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NOTCX

33% FI Score
  • notcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

DWS Strategic High Yield Tax-Free Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NTSMX

33% FI Score
  • ntsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Dupree Mutual Fund North Carolina Tax-Free Short-To-Medium Fund

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NWCCX

33% FI Score
  • nwccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NWHVX

33% FI Score
  • nwhvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NVAFX

33% FI Score
  • nvafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Virginia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs USMYX

33% FI Score
  • usmyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

AlphaSimplex Tactical U.S. Market Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs VALSX

33% FI Score
  • valsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Value Line Select Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs OSCCX

33% FI Score
  • osccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Main Street Small Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo