MSULX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

MSULX is a Alternatives Market Real Estate with HIGH fees.

MSULX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

FI Score

15 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSULX vs MWEBX

42% FI Score
  • mwebx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs EUO

42% FI Score
  • euo
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Euro

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs GLV

42% FI Score
  • glv
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Tactical Allocation

Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund

Expenses: 3.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Tactical Allocation Other fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs TEQAX

42% FI Score
  • teqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PIFCX

42% FI Score
  • pifcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PMYBX

42% FI Score
  • pmybx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PMYCX

42% FI Score
  • pmycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs HABCX

42% FI Score
  • habcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

The Hartford Total Return Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs TLCYX

42% FI Score
  • tlcyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Touchstone Large Cap Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs TMCJX

42% FI Score
  • tmcjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Touchstone Mid Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs TMDPX

42% FI Score
  • tmdpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NLGCX

42% FI Score
  • nlgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Global Strategic Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs HFAAX

42% FI Score
  • hfaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs HAGCX

42% FI Score
  • hagcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NMGAX

42% FI Score
  • nmgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NOUGX

42% FI Score
  • nougx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Northern U.S. Government Fund

Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NRICX

42% FI Score
  • nricx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Real Asset Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs OAACX

42% FI Score
  • oaacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Inveso Active Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs JSOCX

42% FI Score
  • jsocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs URE

42% FI Score
  • ure
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra Real Estate

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo