MSULX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

MSULX is a Alternatives Market Real Estate with HIGH fees.

MSULX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

FI Score

15 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSULX vs FEBAX

48% FI Score
  • febax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs GVIP

48% FI Score
  • gvip
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs USNYX

48% FI Score
  • usnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA New York Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs LTNYX

48% FI Score
  • ltnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term New York Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PSVDX

48% FI Score
  • psvdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

PGIM QMA Small-Cap Value Fund- Class R2

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs FSCAX

48% FI Score
  • fscax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs JPEM

48% FI Score
  • jpem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

JPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PEQCX

48% FI Score
  • peqcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Putnam Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs SENCX

48% FI Score
  • sencx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Touchstone Large Cap Focused Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs QFVOX

48% FI Score
  • qfvox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund Class Ordinary

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PEQNX

48% FI Score
  • peqnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Putnam Equity Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs ANBEX

48% FI Score
  • anbex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Funds Strategic Bond Fund Class F-1

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs NUGT

48% FI Score
  • nugt
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X Shares

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs JCLBX

48% FI Score
  • jclbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs MCHFX

48% FI Score
  • mchfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Matthews China Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs FNYIX

48% FI Score
  • fnyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Franklin New York Tax Free Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs FCITX

48% FI Score
  • fcitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Franklin Federal Intermediate-Term Tax-Free Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs MTMAX

48% FI Score
  • mtmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MainStay MacKay Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs BSCFX

48% FI Score
  • bscfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Baron Small Cap Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs MTZIX

48% FI Score
  • mtzix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2055 Series Class I

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo