MSLVX : BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Service Shares

MSLVX is a US Stocks Market Large Value with MODERATE fees.

MSLVX

BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Service Shares

FI Score

49 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSLVX vs VLAAX

44% FI Score
  • vlaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Value Line Asset Allocation Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs PBDAX

44% FI Score
  • pbdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs NYAEX

44% FI Score
  • nyaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

American Funds Tax-Exempt Fund of New York® Class F-1

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs MBAGX

44% FI Score
  • mbagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs MCAGX

44% FI Score
  • mcagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs MCNKX

44% FI Score
  • mcnkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund Investor C1 Shares

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs OCMIX

44% FI Score
  • ocmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Invesco Select Risk: Moderate Investor Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs MHITX

44% FI Score
  • mhitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs OSMCX

44% FI Score
  • osmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer International Small-Mid Company Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs MTIIX

44% FI Score
  • mtiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Infrastructure Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs MVIN

44% FI Score
  • mvin
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Natixis Seeyond International Minimum Volatility ETF

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs ANGCX

44% FI Score
  • angcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Angel Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs AAHYX

44% FI Score
  • aahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs AEMVX

44% FI Score
  • aemvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio Class Y

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs AEMZX

44% FI Score
  • aemzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs AGGAX

44% FI Score
  • aggax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs ALDAX

44% FI Score
  • aldax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Limited Duration Credit Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs ARGT

44% FI Score
  • argt
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

Global X MSCI Argentina ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs ARTOX

44% FI Score
  • artox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice In Retirement Portfolio Investor Class

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSLVX vs NCACX

44% FI Score
  • ncacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen California Municipal Bond Fund Class C2

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo