MSACX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class I
Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$MSACX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- chasx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Chase Growth Fund Class N Shares
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pccfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
PGIM Income Builder Fund-Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- thyax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Touchstone High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cper
- ETF
- Commodities
- Focused
United States Copper Index Fund, LP
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
- dgbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Real Estate
BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund - Class C
Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »
- csoax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Credit Suisse Strategic Income Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- msptx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Advantage Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 2.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dafgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- rew
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
ProShares UltraShort Technology
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »