MRSNX : BMO Small-Cap Value Fund Class I

MRSNX is a US Stocks Market Small Value with MODERATE fees.

MRSNX

BMO Small-Cap Value Fund Class I

FI Score

33 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MRSNX vs PGIUX

29% FI Score
  • pgiux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infrastructure Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs WAIOX

29% FI Score
  • waiox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Wasatch International Opportunities Fund® Investor Class

Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs ETIMX

29% FI Score
  • etimx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs MTCCX

29% FI Score
  • mtccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

MFS Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs KCIIX

29% FI Score
  • kciix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Knights of Columbus International Equity Fund I Share

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs MTCBX

29% FI Score
  • mtcbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

MFS Technology Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs PFAFX

29% FI Score
  • pfafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Principal International Fund I Class A

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs SBB

29% FI Score
  • sbb
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short SmallCap600

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs EMVCX

29% FI Score
  • emvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Innovators Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs PETCX

29% FI Score
  • petcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

PIMCO RealEstateRealReturn Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 3.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs EMKCX

29% FI Score
  • emkcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs JOAMX

29% FI Score
  • joamx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

JOHCM Asia Ex-Japan Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs NMHAX

29% FI Score
  • nmhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs NMDMX

29% FI Score
  • nmdmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Maryland Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs ACCAX

29% FI Score
  • accax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Century Strategic Allocation: Conservative Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs PLHCX

29% FI Score
  • plhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

PGIM QMA Long-Short Equity Fund-Class C

Expenses: 2.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs NIMAX

29% FI Score
  • nimax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs ABFAX

29% FI Score
  • abfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Beacon Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs EDICX

29% FI Score
  • edicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MRSNX vs HIPRX

29% FI Score
  • hiprx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Hartford Inflation Plus Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo