MOO : VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF

MOO is a Sector Equity Market Consumer Defensive with MODERATE fees.

MOO

VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF

FI Score

51 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Consumer Defensive funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MOO vs VFPIX

25% FI Score
  • vfpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Private Capital Management Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs HRSVX

25% FI Score
  • hrsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Heartland Select Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs WTLTX

25% FI Score
  • wtltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs JEDCX

25% FI Score
  • jedcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs THLSX

25% FI Score
  • thlsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Thornburg Long/Short Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 3.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs TVEIX

25% FI Score
  • tveix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Guggenheim RBP® Dividend Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs FJSIX

25% FI Score
  • fjsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen High Income Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs TVLCX

25% FI Score
  • tvlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Touchstone Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs TSMDX

25% FI Score
  • tsmdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund Institutional

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs SSEMX

25% FI Score
  • ssemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

State Street Defensive Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs RYSOX

25% FI Score
  • rysox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Rydex S&P 500 Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs CAACX

25% FI Score
  • caacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Calvert Growth Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs YASSX

25% FI Score
  • yassx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs SFVAX

25% FI Score
  • sfvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

AIG Strategic Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs PLAHX

25% FI Score
  • plahx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pacific Funds High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs SGGCX

25% FI Score
  • sggcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs LBGAX

25% FI Score
  • lbgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

ClearBridge Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs RFAP

25% FI Score
  • rfap
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Asia Pacific ETF

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs HQBRX

25% FI Score
  • hqbrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs JUCTX

25% FI Score
  • juctx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Janus Henderson Absolute Return Income Opportunities Fund - T Shares

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo