MOO : VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF

MOO is a Sector Equity Market Consumer Defensive with MODERATE fees.

MOO

VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF

FI Score

51 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Consumer Defensive funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MOO vs PGYBX

28% FI Score
  • pgybx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Global Multisector Income Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs EWV

28% FI Score
  • ewv
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs GSCCX

28% FI Score
  • gsccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs FDIV

28% FI Score
  • fdiv
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

First Trust Strategic Income ETF

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs HCMGX

28% FI Score
  • hcmgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

HCM Tactical Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs HFHAX

28% FI Score
  • hfhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs HFHSX

28% FI Score
  • hfhsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs WNYAX

28% FI Score
  • wnyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Wilmington New York Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs HIMGX

28% FI Score
  • himgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Harbor Mid Cap Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs FMF

28% FI Score
  • fmf
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Future

First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs FMNCX

28% FI Score
  • fmncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Municipal High Yield Advantage Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs HSMCX

28% FI Score
  • hsmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

The Hartford Small Company Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs FNYFX

28% FI Score
  • fnyfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Delaware Tax-Free New York II Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs HVORX

28% FI Score
  • hvorx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Hartford Quality Value Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs HWLCX

28% FI Score
  • hwlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs HWMAX

28% FI Score
  • hwmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs TYGGX

28% FI Score
  • tyggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Touchstone International Growth Opportunities Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs FTVSX

28% FI Score
  • ftvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs FTXSX

28% FI Score
  • ftxsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MOO vs GIJPX

28% FI Score
  • gijpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Guggenheim Municipal Income Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo