Diversification Rating
4 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$MOM Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,115 Alternatives Neutral funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- oarix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Oakmark International Fund Service Class
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- psci
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Industrials
Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- qcpix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
AQR Core Plus Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- ffc
- Mutual Fund
- Other
- Preferred Stock
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Securities Income Fund
Expenses: 2.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Preferred Stock Other fund. See why »
- thyfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund Class S
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- aaipx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
American Beacon International Equity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- robo
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- eaisx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Parametric International Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- tmcpx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Touchstone Mid Cap Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- acctx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
American Century Core Plus Fund I Class
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- mfaix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Advantage Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- fslsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Fidelity® Value Strategies Fund
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hsnix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
The Hartford Strategic Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- lfrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwcix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Unconstrained Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ealdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Eaton Vance Short Duration Government Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- psopx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
JPMorgan Small Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- cfnlx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Commerce National Tax Free Intermediate Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »