Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Putnam Global Technology Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
BlackRock Real Estate Securities Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
MainStay Balanced Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
Thornburg Long/Short Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 3.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
First Trust Hong Kong AlphaDEX Fund
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Aberdeen International Small Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
Guggenheim Small Cap Value Institutional Fund
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Putnam International Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
John Hancock ESG Large Cap Core Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
The Investment House Growth Fund
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Asia Pacific ETF
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Heartland Select Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
HCM Tactical Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2025 Adam Fortuna
Site Map