MNBAX : Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series Class S

MNBAX is a Allocation Market All-In-One with HIGH fees.

MNBAX

Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series Class S

FI Score

35 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MNBAX vs NTHEX

21% FI Score
  • nthex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Northeast Investors Trust

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs RYRUX

21% FI Score
  • ryrux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs IEGCX

21% FI Score
  • iegcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Invesco International Small Company Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs IEVOX

21% FI Score
  • ievox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Lazard International Equity Value Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs NBNCX

21% FI Score
  • nbncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Neuberger Berman International Select Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs SCCUX

21% FI Score
  • sccux
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Invesco Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs JSVTX

21% FI Score
  • jsvtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund Class T

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs SAOCX

21% FI Score
  • saocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs IHFAX

21% FI Score
  • ihfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Integrity High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs INSIX

21% FI Score
  • insix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Catalyst Insider Buying Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs TSFAX

21% FI Score
  • tsfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Touchstone Small Cap Class A

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs SVTIX

21% FI Score
  • svtix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Symons Value Institutional Fund Class II

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs GITCX

21% FI Score
  • gitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs GIUIX

21% FI Score
  • giuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund Institutional

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs FFEU

21% FI Score
  • ffeu
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Barclays ETN+ FI Enhanced Europe 50 ETN Series C

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs ECGOX

21% FI Score
  • ecgox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Eaton Vance Government Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs TGRCX

21% FI Score
  • tgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Pacific Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs JLGAX

21% FI Score
  • jlgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

JAG Large Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs TIOAX

21% FI Score
  • tioax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Transamerica Inflation Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MNBAX vs NEFHX

21% FI Score
  • nefhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo