MMSIX : Praxis Small Cap Index Fund Class I

MMSIX is a US Stocks Market Small Blend index fund with LOW fees.

MMSIX

Praxis Small Cap Index Fund Class I

FI Score

54 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MMSIX vs DSL

35% FI Score
  • dsl
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund

Expenses: 3.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs DWAT

35% FI Score
  • dwat
  • ETF
  • Other
  • Tactical Allocation

Arrow DWA Tactical ETF

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Tactical Allocation Other fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs EBNAX

35% FI Score
  • ebnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs ECEIX

35% FI Score
  • eceix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs ECFAX

35% FI Score
  • ecfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs ECGMX

35% FI Score
  • ecgmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs ECLTX

35% FI Score
  • ecltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs EKWDX

35% FI Score
  • ekwdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Wells Fargo Precious Metals Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs EMSH

35% FI Score
  • emsh
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ProShares Short Term USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs ERBCX

35% FI Score
  • erbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs ETIHX

35% FI Score
  • etihx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund CLASS I SHARES

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs EVCGX

35% FI Score
  • evcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs EXNYX

35% FI Score
  • exnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance New York Municipal Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs FCFRX

35% FI Score
  • fcfrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs FIRNX

35% FI Score
  • firnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Simplicity RMD Income Fund

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs FLEU

35% FI Score
  • fleu
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Barclays ETN+ FI Enhanced Europe 50 ETN Series B

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs FPIVX

35% FI Score
  • fpivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

FPA International Value Fund

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs FXZ

35% FI Score
  • fxz
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs FYHTX

35% FI Score
  • fyhtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Fidelity® Commodity Strategy Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare MMSIX vs GERCX

35% FI Score
  • gercx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Insights Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo