Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$MLN Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ldvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Leland Thomson Reuters Venture Capital Index Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ithcx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Invesco Technology Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- jiftx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Janus Henderson International Value Fund Class T
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- gsgcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mbeax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AMG GW&K Global Allocation Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mblax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Madison Diversified Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mgrlx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Real Estate
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Real Estate Portfolio Class L
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »
- mgsex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
AMG Managers Special Equity Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- lpfax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »