Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$MLACX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- bfonx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Biondo Focus Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mpgex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Meritage Growth Equity Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jpfcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan Equity Focus Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- insix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Catalyst Insider Buying Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wwwfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Kinetics Internet Fund No Load Class
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pagrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- qblgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Federated MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class B Shares
Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- cpecx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hsuax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rational Dynamic Brands Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »