MIQBX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio Class A
Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$MIQBX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- don
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Dividend Fund
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ekjyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Premier Large Company Growth Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- smb
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
VanEck Vectors AMT-Free Short Municipal Index ETF
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fftfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Franklin Federal Limited-Term Tax-Free Income Fund Class A1
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhkdx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2030 Fund Class K6
Expenses: 0.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- fjtkx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® 2045 Fund Class K6
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- ftec
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Expenses: 0.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- fthsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- gaosx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gbosx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
JPMorgan Global Bond Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- ggsax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- apgax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- bldix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BlackRock Managed Income Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fcamx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Class A1
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- flaax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mtlfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- smdyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Western Asset Short Duration Municipal Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sbltx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Western Asset Intermediate-Term Municipals Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »