Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$MIGIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mcgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ugeix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USAA Global Equity Income Fund Fund Shares
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wggnx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
William Blair Global Leaders Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dayfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AlphaSimplex Multi-Asset Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nglax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Neuberger Berman Global Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dvfax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Cohen & Steers Alternative Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pqizx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- csrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Columbia Global Dividend Opportunity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- glvcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »