MHFIX : AXS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class I Shares

MHFIX is a Alternatives Market Future with MODERATE fees.

MHFIX

AXS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class I Shares

FI Score

36 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,115 Alternatives Future funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MHFIX vs PFGRX

47% FI Score
  • pfgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs PFIAX

47% FI Score
  • pfiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Low Duration Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs ALARX

47% FI Score
  • alarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs ALNYX

47% FI Score
  • alnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund New York Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs AMZA

47% FI Score
  • amza
  • ETF
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

InfraCap MLP ETF

Expenses: 2.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs NAWGX

47% FI Score
  • nawgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs NBMTX

47% FI Score
  • nbmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Trust Class

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs NEARX

47% FI Score
  • nearx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs ARGFX

47% FI Score
  • argfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Ariel Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs ASDVX

47% FI Score
  • asdvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century Short Duration Strategic Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs NSTRX

47% FI Score
  • nstrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Short Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs SYV

47% FI Score
  • syv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

SPDR MFS Systematic Value Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs ASHS

47% FI Score
  • ashs
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China-A Shares Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs ASHX

47% FI Score
  • ashx
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs OAKGX

47% FI Score
  • oakgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Oakmark Global Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs AWP

47% FI Score
  • awp
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Aberdeen Global Premier Property

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs SUIIX

47% FI Score
  • suiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

DWS CROCI International Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs OPER

47% FI Score
  • oper
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Short

ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs OSINX

47% FI Score
  • osinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class R

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MHFIX vs BASBX

47% FI Score
  • basbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Brown Advisory Sustainable Bond Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo