Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$MGHYX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pcnnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class I-3
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- stot
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
SPDR DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hsdax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Short Duration Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pfunx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class I-3
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mhcax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nstrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Short Term Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hyzd
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cosix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Strategic Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- miibx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Madison High Quality Bond Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »