MFXAX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio Class A

MFXAX is a Bond Market Total US Bond Market with MODERATE fees.

MFXAX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio Class A

FI Score

50 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Total US Bond Market funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MFXAX vs CYPIX

28% FI Score
  • cypix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Consumer Services UltraSector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs PMPCX

28% FI Score
  • pmpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Putnam Sustainable Future Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs KORU

28% FI Score
  • koru
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs QCACX

28% FI Score
  • qcacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Federated MDT All Cap Core Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs GOODX

28% FI Score
  • goodx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

GoodHaven Fund

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs TTTN

28% FI Score
  • tttn
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

TigerShares UP Fintech China-U.S. Internet Titans ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs AATIX

28% FI Score
  • aatix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs RSNRX

28% FI Score
  • rsnrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Victory Global Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs RPFCX

28% FI Score
  • rpfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Davis Appreciation & Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs WSBFX

28% FI Score
  • wsbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Walden Balanced Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs NAPIX

28% FI Score
  • napix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Voya Multi-Manager International Small Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs MSUSX

28% FI Score
  • msusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs WPGTX

28% FI Score
  • wpgtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

WPG Partners Small/Micro Cap Value Fund

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs JCRCX

28% FI Score
  • jcrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommodities Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs BRSHX

28% FI Score
  • brshx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

MFS Blended Research Small Cap Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs AREFX

28% FI Score
  • arefx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2055 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs RESCX

28% FI Score
  • rescx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

HSBC Opportunity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs MCEGX

28% FI Score
  • mcegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BlackRock Long-Horizon Equity Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs LYRBX

28% FI Score
  • lyrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFXAX vs MASGX

28% FI Score
  • masgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Matthews Asia ESG Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo