Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$MFWCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hrlcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
The Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mlnix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lpfax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gdmox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- piptx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pqicx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- adavx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aberdeen Dynamic Dividend Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lperx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- trxix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »