Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$MCEF Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 746 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fotax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Nuveen Oregon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rstyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Victory Tax-Exempt Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- szmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
DWS Intermediate Tax-Free Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- conax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia U.S. Social Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- colnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia Strategic New York Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pnncx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Putnam New York Tax Exempt Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- auncx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- avaax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pthyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »