Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
10 /10
We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
American Century Investments One Choice 2025 Portfolio C Class
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Wells Fargo Precious Metals Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
American Century Investments One Choice 2060 Portfolio I Class
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
American Century Investments One Choice 2040 Portfolio A Class
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth Fund I Class
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Horizon Active Risk Assist® Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
Federated MDT Large Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Invesco High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
ACM Dynamic Opportunity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund
Expenses: 3.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
1919 Maryland Tax-Free Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2026 Adam Fortuna
Site Map