Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$MAILX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ncbvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
PGIM QMA Mid-Cap Value Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- diva
- ETF
- Alternatives
- Short
AGFiQ Hedged Dividend Income Fund
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- dnsvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Dunham Small Cap Value Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pfmax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Pacific Funds Small-Cap Growth Class A
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryamx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Guggenheim Long Short Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- ryrux
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Leveraged Equities
Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
- emtcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pci
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
PIMCO Dynamic Credit and Mortgage Income Fund
Expenses: 4.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- epbix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
EuroPac International Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rymfx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Future
Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class P
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
- rymhx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- sainx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix Corporate Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pgivx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Putnam Focused Equity Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pgiex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Putnam Focused Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tmldx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Thrivent Multidimensional Income Fund Class S
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- pcicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
PGIM California Muni Income Fund-Class C
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pdscx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- imncx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Transamerica Global Equity Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wfgwx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »