MACSX : Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund Investor Class

MACSX is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with MODERATE fees.

MACSX

Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund Investor Class

FI Score

53 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MACSX vs NQCCX

17% FI Score
  • nqccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Nuveen NWQ Large Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs RYDAX

17% FI Score
  • rydax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average® Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs PASS

17% FI Score
  • pass
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily Cnsmr Discret Bear 3XShrs

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs OBMCX

17% FI Score
  • obmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Oberweis Micro-Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs PUDCX

17% FI Score
  • pudcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs PWDCX

17% FI Score
  • pwdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Power Dividend Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs BXEAX

17% FI Score
  • bxeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Emerging Markets Debt Blended Total Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs BXHAX

17% FI Score
  • bxhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs CAXCX

17% FI Score
  • caxcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs CHUSX

17% FI Score
  • chusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Alger Global Focus Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs DACFX

17% FI Score
  • dacfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AlphaSimplex Multi-Asset Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs PCTGX

17% FI Score
  • pctgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PIMCO California Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs DGSMX

17% FI Score
  • dgsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

DGHM V2000 SmallCap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs DHTRX

17% FI Score
  • dhtrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Centre Active U.S. Treasury Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs CUSRX

17% FI Score
  • cusrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Cullen Small Cap Value Fund Class Retail Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs DROCX

17% FI Score
  • drocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Diamond Hill Research Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs PFSEX

17% FI Score
  • pfsex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs TLGCX

17% FI Score
  • tlgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs ECOLX

17% FI Score
  • ecolx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Riverbridge Eco Leaders® Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs RSINX

17% FI Score
  • rsinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Victory RS Investors Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo