Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$MACSX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mmibx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
MFS Municipal Income Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ntbix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Navigator Tactical Fixed Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- agbvx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- International
American Century Global Bond Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »
- acaax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- acgkx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Invesco Growth and Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- nvscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- otcnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Invesco Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pcvax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
AllianzGI Small-Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- afnax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »