Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$MACSX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- asdvx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Century Short Duration Strategic Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nstrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Short Term Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- syv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
SPDR MFS Systematic Value Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- oakgx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Oakmark Global Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- awp
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Real Estate
Aberdeen Global Premier Property
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »
- oper
- ETF
- Alternative
- Short
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- osinx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class R
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- basbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Brown Advisory Sustainable Bond Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- bawax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Advisor Shares
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »