MACSX : Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund Investor Class

MACSX is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with MODERATE fees.

MACSX

Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund Investor Class

FI Score

53 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MACSX vs CPOAX

48% FI Score
  • cpoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Morgan Stanley Insight Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs GVIP

48% FI Score
  • gvip
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs FFR

48% FI Score
  • ffr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

First Trust FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Markets Real Estate Index Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs FHARX

48% FI Score
  • fharx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2040 Fund

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs HFMRX

48% FI Score
  • hfmrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

The Hartford MidCap Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs FIMSX

48% FI Score
  • fimsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Fidelity® Municipal Income 2025 Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs HMVYX

48% FI Score
  • hmvyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs GDNA

48% FI Score
  • gdna
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Goldman Sachs Human Evolution ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs EQRR

48% FI Score
  • eqrr
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs COIAX

48% FI Score
  • coiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Conservative Income Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo