Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$MACSX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- yafix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- useq
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Invesco Russell 1000 Enhanced Equal Weight ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vklmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco Intermediate Term Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vminx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rzg
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- prrzx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Putnam RetirementReady 2040 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- pscu
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Communication Services
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ryf
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Financial Services
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »
- scgvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Sands Capital Global Growth Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »