LZUSX : Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio Institutional Shares

LZUSX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

LZUSX

Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio Institutional Shares

FI Score

37 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LZUSX vs JRBFX

47% FI Score
  • jrbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

John Hancock Regional Bank Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs FTXN

47% FI Score
  • ftxn
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs GQRIX

47% FI Score
  • gqrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs MLDAX

47% FI Score
  • mldax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Short Duration Income Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs MAFRX

47% FI Score
  • mafrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Pioneer Multi-Asset Ultrashort Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs MBFCX

47% FI Score
  • mbfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs GHYB

47% FI Score
  • ghyb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs GF

47% FI Score
  • gf
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

New Germany Fund Inc.

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs MENKX

47% FI Score
  • menkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs LSGSX

47% FI Score
  • lsgsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs MGLAX

47% FI Score
  • mglax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

MFS Global Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs MGRBX

47% FI Score
  • mgrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS International Growth Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs MGRCX

47% FI Score
  • mgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs LIFAX

47% FI Score
  • lifax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs BTMAX

46% FI Score
  • btmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BMO Short-Term Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs TAPR

46% FI Score
  • tapr
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Barclays Inverse US Treasury Aggregate ETN

Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs MDIV

46% FI Score
  • mdiv
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs POSAX

46% FI Score
  • posax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs PPSC

46% FI Score
  • ppsc
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

PortfolioPlus S&P Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LZUSX vs RLTAX

46% FI Score
  • rltax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class Investor

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo