LZSCX : Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares

LZSCX is a US Stocks Market Small Blend with MODERATE fees.

LZSCX

Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares

FI Score

38 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LZSCX vs RMBNX

25% FI Score
  • rmbnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs SILAX

25% FI Score
  • silax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Wells Fargo Diversified International Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs SZEIX

25% FI Score
  • szeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs TGHNX

25% FI Score
  • tghnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

TCW High Yield Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs THLSX

25% FI Score
  • thlsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Thornburg Long/Short Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 3.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs TRXIX

25% FI Score
  • trxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs UCPIX

25% FI Score
  • ucpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort Small-Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs UDPIX

25% FI Score
  • udpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs UGE

25% FI Score
  • uge
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs UUSTX

25% FI Score
  • uustx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

USAA Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund Shares

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs VLHYX

25% FI Score
  • vlhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Value Line Tax-Exempt Fund

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs WFSTX

25% FI Score
  • wfstx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Wells Fargo Specialized Technology Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs WFTDX

25% FI Score
  • wftdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Wells Fargo Specialized Technology Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs WTLTX

25% FI Score
  • wtltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs WVCCX

25% FI Score
  • wvccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Aberdeen International Small Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs YASSX

25% FI Score
  • yassx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs JEDCX

25% FI Score
  • jedcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs AGIAX

25% FI Score
  • agiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

AB Tax-Managed All Market Income Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs BRKAX

25% FI Score
  • brkax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZSCX vs GHACX

25% FI Score
  • ghacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

VanEck Global Hard Assets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo