Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$LZGOX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- bxgyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Global High Yield Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- csoax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Credit Suisse Strategic Income Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- msicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay Unconstrained Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwcsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Corporate Bond Fund Class M
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- irbax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ivy Pictet Targeted Return Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tmayx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Touchstone Credit Opportunities II Fund Y
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dblnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DoubleLine Income Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fehax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Eagle High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ecdax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »