LUBAX : Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund Class A

LUBAX is a Alternative Market Short with HIGH fees.

LUBAX

Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund Class A

FI Score

63 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LUBAX vs ALGCX

17% FI Score
  • algcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Alger International Focus Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs OVECX

17% FI Score
  • ovecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Sterling Capital Mid Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs AFMCX

17% FI Score
  • afmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Acuitas US Microcap Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs CASAX

17% FI Score
  • casax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Columbia Pacific/Asia Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs AFLCX

17% FI Score
  • aflcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Angel Oak Financials Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs SNGRX

17% FI Score
  • sngrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Sit International Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs ORICX

17% FI Score
  • oricx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

North Square Oak Ridge Small Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs PBSRX

17% FI Score
  • pbsrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs PGUCX

17% FI Score
  • pgucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infrastructure Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs SUPCX

17% FI Score
  • supcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

DWS Multi-Asset Growth Allocation Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs BXHAX

17% FI Score
  • bxhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs PLCHX

17% FI Score
  • plchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pacific Funds High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs OFSCX

16% FI Score
  • ofscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Olstein Strategic Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs TNDCX

16% FI Score
  • tndcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2040 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs NIMCX

16% FI Score
  • nimcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs OURAX

16% FI Score
  • ourax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Mission-Auour Risk-Managed Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs RYBHX

16% FI Score
  • rybhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs LEDIX

16% FI Score
  • ledix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard Emerging Markets Debt Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs PFDGX

16% FI Score
  • pfdgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PFG Global Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs PUDBX

16% FI Score
  • pudbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class B

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo