• ctvcx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Growth

Catalyst Small Cap Insider Buying Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• djpy
• ETF
• Money Market
• World

Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long USD vs. JPY Index

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

• dlpcx
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Real Estate

Delaware Global Real Estate Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

• elcsx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Emerald Small Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• ryscx
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Technology

Rydex Electronics Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

• ryjhx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternative
• Leveraged Equities

Rydex Japan 2x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

• rypix
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Industrials

Rydex Transportation Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

• ryhcx
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Healthcare

Rydex Health Care Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

• ryvax
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Energy

Rydex Energy Services Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

• simvx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

SIM Global Core Managed Volatility Fund Class Z Shares

Expenses: 2.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »